Greyhound corp v superior court

Author: tbki

August undefined, 2024

Webdiscovery. (Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 56 Cal.2d at p. 383.) A reviewing court may not use the abuse of discretion standard to shield discovery orders that fall … WebOn March 15, 1965, the San Francisco Superior Court sustained Greyhound's demurrer without leave to amend. Said demurrer was sustained on the basis that the federal …

Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court - 56 Cal.2d 355 - Thu, …

WebVisit the Supreme Court's website for Virginia for Case information. This website has information regarding upcoming court dates, pleadings filed, as well as orders entered in … WebJul 17, 2010 · The Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate, based on Greyhound Corp. v. Sup. Ct. (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355. The California Supreme Court granted review and … scotland 1976

Discovery Prior to Administrative Adjudications. A …

WebThe Beesley opinion points out that in the case of Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal. 2d 355 [15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266], it was held that written statements of independent witnesses are subject to inspection when the need is shown. The court, in the Beesley opinion, at page 208, continues: "Here good cause was shown in the fact ... WebTHE GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCED COUNTY, Respondent; EARLINE Z. CLAY et al., Real Parties in Interest, 56 Cal. 2d … WebAug 13, 2012 · It is a service of the Legal Ethics Committee of the San Diego County Bar Association for SDCBA members. The Work Product Privilege and Discovery of Witness … scotland 1975

Trade Center Properties, Inc. v. Superior Court - casetext.com

GREYHOUND CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT 56 Cal.2d 355 - Casemine

WebFebruary 23, 1961. PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Philbrick McCoy, Judge thereof, to vacate its order denying petitioners' motion to require the real party in interest to answer certain interrogatories. Writ granted. Brock, Fleishman Rykoff for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents. WebJun 18, 2013 · Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 C2d 355, 15 CR 90, interpreting the Discovery Act of 1957. The intention of the discovery statutes is to … pre made charcuterie board whole foodsWebMorris Stulsaft Foundation v. Superior Court ( Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 378-379 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266]; City of… Greyhound Corp. v. … scotland 1978 kit

"WebTHE GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCED COUNTY, Respondent; EARLINE Z. CLAY et al., Real Parties in Interest Sac. No. 7274 Supreme Court of California 56 Cal. 2d 355; 364 P.2d 266; 15 Cal. Rptr. 90; 1961 Cal. LEXIS 302 August 3, 1961 SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Petitioner's Application for a … " - Greyhound corp v superior court

Greyhound corp v superior court

Courts & Judicial Services Loudoun County, VA - Official Website

WebGREYHOUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MERCED, Respondent; Earline Z. Clay et al., … WebJoe successfully argued State v. S.S. before the Supreme Court, where the Court changed the standard of review in video-taped confession cases. ... District of Columbia Superior …

Did you know?

WebJul 19, 2024 · As the California Supreme Court explained: The discovery process is designed to “‘make a trial less a game of blindman’s bluff and more a fair contest with the basic issues and facts disclosed to the fullest practicable extent.'” Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 376. WebThe same concept was stated in Rolf Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court, supra, 186 Cal.App.2d 876, 881, and to some extent in Laddon v. Superior Court, supra, 167 Cal.App. {Page 56 Cal.2d 391} 391, wherein (at p. 395) the court expressed the view that relevancy as applied to pretrial examination (discovery) is more loosely construed than it is when ...

WebJun 25, 2012 · The majority, relying on Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266 ( Greyhound ) and expressly declining to follow Nacht & Lewis, concluded that witness interviews and the information sought by form interrogatory No. 12.3 are not entitled as a matter of law to absolute or qualified work … WebJul 29, 2010 · C.C.P. §2024.010 (pdf), Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 C2d 355 (pdf), 391 Hint: Don’t confuse rules of evidence with rules for discovery. Discovery rules are more liberal. “Irrelevant” The interrogatory must be relevant to the subject matter of the litigation. Deaile v. General Tel. Co. (1974) 40 CA3d 841 (pdf), 850.

Web(E.g., Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 394 [15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266].) [4] In order to facilitate the ascertainment of truth and the just resolution … WebOct 17, 2024 · Though broad, the trial court's discretion in discovery matters is not unlimited. (Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 380 [15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266].) ‘[I]f there is no legal justification for such exercise of discretion it must be held that an abuse occurred.’ (Carlson v.

WebThe court held in Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 397, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266, that remarks made by defense investigators were not protected by the attorney-client privilege. Greyhound questioned Holm's ruling that photographs sent to counsel were protected by the attorney-client privilege, and determined that ...

WebJul 13, 2024 · The statutory scheme vests trial courts with " ‘wide discretion’ " to allow or prohibit discovery. ( Emerson Electric Co. v. Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1101, 1107, 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 883, 946 P.2d 841, quoting Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 378, 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266 .) scotland 1972WebSep 10, 2014 · The same court relied on Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961), 56 Cal.2d 355, 382-383, 388 as to how statutes must be viewed, stating: “The statutes must be liberally construed in favor of discovery, and the courts must not extend the limits on discovery beyond those expressed by the legislature. Other than to protect against … scotland 1978WebGet Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 364 P.2d 266 (1961), California Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by … scotland 1977WebMar 4, 2010 · In Greyhound, supra, 56 Cal.2d 355, the trial court granted the plaintiff's request for production of statements taken from independent, percipient witnesses to an accident that was the subject of the litigation. pre made chenille footballWebThe office provides legal services to the low-income and elderly citizens of Loudoun County, including assistance with problems such as custody, child support, debt … scotland 1973WebIt has been considered and found untenable by this court and by several District Courts of Appeal. In Chronicle Pub. Co. v. Superior Court, supra, 54 Cal.2d 548, 7 Cal.Rptr. 109, … scotland 1974WebIn Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance … premade christian book covers